Hey, folks, Joel here. I'm hijacking Kimberly's account for a day. Mua-ha-ha!!!
Yesterday I was helping AZ with his Chicago Landmark speech. He was given the assignment to write a 3-minute speech and build a scale model of the 111 S. Wacker building. Research took the form of a few hours spent online. He had hand-written his speech, and I was taking dictation.
In the process, there were 2 particular spots of the speech where we discovered he lacked a certain bit of information. As I'm typing along in Word, he comes across the acronym "LEED" and says, "I don't know what that stands for." So I jump over to Firefox and Google it and get a definition in about 10 seconds, which I cut and paste right into the document. Later, he mentions a physical feature of the building that he was uncertain of, so I hop over to Firefox again, Google "111 S. Wacker", click a pdf link, and in 10 seconds I'm looking at a picture of the feature in question.
At this point the following occurred to me: 10 years ago, if he was doing this report, the same process would have taken him weeks of effort, hours and hours of research, and more hours of travel to and from libraries, downtown Chicago, and photo processing labs. He would also probably have had to schedule interviews, by phone or in person, with various architectural professionals. Just the simple question "What does 'LEED' stand for?" would have taken a couple of hours at the local library, and possibly a longer trip to a college library or a series of phone calls to various libraries and government offices. Instead, just sitting here on my backside, I can pop open multiple hugely powerful applications, tap into VAST databases of information stored thousands of miles away, and in a matter of SECONDS learn all sorts of new things.
That's mindblowing enough, but perhaps even more profound was my realization that AZ won't understand for years -- possibly he never will -- the magnitude of the changes wrought by this technology. Maybe someday 15 years from now, he'll be sitting around working on a paper for college and he'll look up and say, "Holy frak, how did people used to DO this?!?"
And the pace that technology is racing along at is constantly accelerating, too. Before 1844 (the invention of the telegraph -- which, by the way, I just jumped to a new browser window to look up, instead of tripping down the block to the library) if you wanted to know something that was happening more than 50 miles away, you had to write a letter and have it physically walked to it's destination, then wait for the addressee to read the letter, then wait for the reply to be physically walked back to you.
Over 30 years later, in 1876 (Google again) the telephone was invented. Only 9 years later, AT&T opened, and true large-volume, long-distance information exchange became possible. But still, some person at the other end had to DO the research, then get back to you. Faster, yet still quite cumbersome.
So it took almost half a century to make possible remote research, and decades more to make that possibility available to every community. (AT&T only served a few major northeastern US cities when it was founded in 1885.) And it STILL involved, at some point, someone actually getting up and going to the library to do actual work.
In the past decade alone, we've completely eliminated the need for anyone to bestir themselves from their comfortable perch to do even very deep levels of research on any but the most esoteric of subjects. Seriously, check out the title of this paper on... well, something medical, anyway... that I was able to discover with 5 seconds of "work":
Subatomic and atomic crystallographic studies of aldose
reductase: implications for inhibitor binding.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1509 5001
I can't even figure out HOW that relates to medicine. Even if you physically went down to a hospital and asked around, you couldn't find this information. You couldn't even stumble across this kind of information, because nobody knows that this is even a question you could ask. And yet, because some dude discovered that certain types of sand can carry electric current, and because some even older dude discovered that electricity can be made to flow in a current, and because some even OLDER dude discovered that electricity, -- not that it did anything, just that it is -- here we are.
What would impress a visitor to today's America from 200 years ago the most? Transportation? No, all of that can be explained in terms of physical laws that people have always known. (Explosions push levers that turn wheels that make cars go, or the wheels turn giant fans that push against the air and wings shaped like bird wings lift the airplane into the sky.) Skyscrapers or suspension bridges or any of our great feats of architecture? No, those are all extensions of existing disciplines using stronger materials, and besides, didn't people build pyramids and hanging gardens and great walls thousands of years ago?
No, nothing physical, nothing analog, because that's all just building on ideas that have existed for millennia. The digital revolution is truly that: a revolutionary new TYPE of concept, one that had never before existed. Suddenly, now, nothing has to have a physical existence to exist. Try to explain to anyone from a pre-digital age that even though you can see ANYTHING -- people, places, things -- that object ISN'T. You can see a building, but there's no building there. If you look at a real building and close your eyes, the building is still there, but the things you see on a computer screen only exist as ideas in your mind and only while you are looking at them. Where does that picture go when you click a new link? The only proper answer is that it can't go anywhere, because it never WAS. Electronics don't even work via the presence or absence of specific electrons; they work through electronic potential. One of the first things you learn in chemistry -- or the first time you hear about quantum theory -- is that you cannot point to one electron, only to a region where an electron might be. To have a physical identity, you MUST be able to point to a thing and say, "This is it." But a digital idea, an electronic image, built of electron clouds, by definition cannot be specifically pointed to.
*******
Um... wow. OK. Well, this is a prime example of why I was voted simultaneously "Most Outrageous" and "Most Profound" by my high school class. I suppose.
Yesterday I was helping AZ with his Chicago Landmark speech. He was given the assignment to write a 3-minute speech and build a scale model of the 111 S. Wacker building. Research took the form of a few hours spent online. He had hand-written his speech, and I was taking dictation.
In the process, there were 2 particular spots of the speech where we discovered he lacked a certain bit of information. As I'm typing along in Word, he comes across the acronym "LEED" and says, "I don't know what that stands for." So I jump over to Firefox and Google it and get a definition in about 10 seconds, which I cut and paste right into the document. Later, he mentions a physical feature of the building that he was uncertain of, so I hop over to Firefox again, Google "111 S. Wacker", click a pdf link, and in 10 seconds I'm looking at a picture of the feature in question.
At this point the following occurred to me: 10 years ago, if he was doing this report, the same process would have taken him weeks of effort, hours and hours of research, and more hours of travel to and from libraries, downtown Chicago, and photo processing labs. He would also probably have had to schedule interviews, by phone or in person, with various architectural professionals. Just the simple question "What does 'LEED' stand for?" would have taken a couple of hours at the local library, and possibly a longer trip to a college library or a series of phone calls to various libraries and government offices. Instead, just sitting here on my backside, I can pop open multiple hugely powerful applications, tap into VAST databases of information stored thousands of miles away, and in a matter of SECONDS learn all sorts of new things.
That's mindblowing enough, but perhaps even more profound was my realization that AZ won't understand for years -- possibly he never will -- the magnitude of the changes wrought by this technology. Maybe someday 15 years from now, he'll be sitting around working on a paper for college and he'll look up and say, "Holy frak, how did people used to DO this?!?"
And the pace that technology is racing along at is constantly accelerating, too. Before 1844 (the invention of the telegraph -- which, by the way, I just jumped to a new browser window to look up, instead of tripping down the block to the library) if you wanted to know something that was happening more than 50 miles away, you had to write a letter and have it physically walked to it's destination, then wait for the addressee to read the letter, then wait for the reply to be physically walked back to you.
Over 30 years later, in 1876 (Google again) the telephone was invented. Only 9 years later, AT&T opened, and true large-volume, long-distance information exchange became possible. But still, some person at the other end had to DO the research, then get back to you. Faster, yet still quite cumbersome.
So it took almost half a century to make possible remote research, and decades more to make that possibility available to every community. (AT&T only served a few major northeastern US cities when it was founded in 1885.) And it STILL involved, at some point, someone actually getting up and going to the library to do actual work.
In the past decade alone, we've completely eliminated the need for anyone to bestir themselves from their comfortable perch to do even very deep levels of research on any but the most esoteric of subjects. Seriously, check out the title of this paper on... well, something medical, anyway... that I was able to discover with 5 seconds of "work":
Subatomic and atomic crystallographic studies of aldose
reductase: implications for inhibitor binding.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1509
I can't even figure out HOW that relates to medicine. Even if you physically went down to a hospital and asked around, you couldn't find this information. You couldn't even stumble across this kind of information, because nobody knows that this is even a question you could ask. And yet, because some dude discovered that certain types of sand can carry electric current, and because some even older dude discovered that electricity can be made to flow in a current, and because some even OLDER dude discovered that electricity, -- not that it did anything, just that it is -- here we are.
What would impress a visitor to today's America from 200 years ago the most? Transportation? No, all of that can be explained in terms of physical laws that people have always known. (Explosions push levers that turn wheels that make cars go, or the wheels turn giant fans that push against the air and wings shaped like bird wings lift the airplane into the sky.) Skyscrapers or suspension bridges or any of our great feats of architecture? No, those are all extensions of existing disciplines using stronger materials, and besides, didn't people build pyramids and hanging gardens and great walls thousands of years ago?
No, nothing physical, nothing analog, because that's all just building on ideas that have existed for millennia. The digital revolution is truly that: a revolutionary new TYPE of concept, one that had never before existed. Suddenly, now, nothing has to have a physical existence to exist. Try to explain to anyone from a pre-digital age that even though you can see ANYTHING -- people, places, things -- that object ISN'T. You can see a building, but there's no building there. If you look at a real building and close your eyes, the building is still there, but the things you see on a computer screen only exist as ideas in your mind and only while you are looking at them. Where does that picture go when you click a new link? The only proper answer is that it can't go anywhere, because it never WAS. Electronics don't even work via the presence or absence of specific electrons; they work through electronic potential. One of the first things you learn in chemistry -- or the first time you hear about quantum theory -- is that you cannot point to one electron, only to a region where an electron might be. To have a physical identity, you MUST be able to point to a thing and say, "This is it." But a digital idea, an electronic image, built of electron clouds, by definition cannot be specifically pointed to.
*******
Um... wow. OK. Well, this is a prime example of why I was voted simultaneously "Most Outrageous" and "Most Profound" by my high school class. I suppose.
Current Mood: besmoggled
Leave a comment
